Monday, October 31, 2016

Twitter's Melbourne Cup livestream could change how we 'broadcast' sport

Https%3a%2f%2fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2fuploads%2fcard%2fimage%2f267256%2fhttp-_2f_2fmashable.com_2fwp-content_2fuploads_2f2015_2f11_2fmichelle1
Feed-twFeed-fb

The horse race that stops the nation, Australia's the Melbourne Cup, will this year be streamed live on Twitter Tuesday, competing with the Seven Network's stream and live TV broadcast of the race.


The Melbourne Cup is not the first sport that Twitter has live streamed, but is the first outside the United States.



Earlier this year the National Football League (NFL) in the United States announced Twitter as "its exclusive partner" to stream certain games to a global audience for the 2016 NFL Regular Season.


The deal worth US$10 million dollars for ten Thursday night games, far less than the US$45 million per game paid by CBS and NBC. Read more...

More about Gambling, Horse Racing, Sports, Broadcast, and Livestreaming


A Social Media Manager's View on SEO

If you're a social media manager, you may see the world of search-engine optimization as arcane Google trickery mixed with quasi-technical babblings.


Allow me to show you how to make Google and the various folks who do SEO your buddies.


First, Google what you think you should be ranking on.


I did a search on “Facebook dollar a day” just now and was happy to see our articles in the first two organic results. There is one ad ahead of us, and one of the folks that we taught how to do Facebook ads is the third organic result.



Incidentally, if you want to see search results that are not biased by your search activity, make sure you add “pws=0” to your query string, which means “personalized web search” is off. The geeks out there will also note that even if you simulate logged-out search results, Google is still personalizing based on your location and user agent.



Oddly, we didn't intentionally try to “SEO” for this or any other key phrases. That's because SEO (getting rankings in search results) is the result of strong content marketing, not some activity you do.


Some people might say this is a competitive search because there are 187 million pages chasing this query (see first screenshot). And the SEO smarties will say that using the in-title tool yields a more accurate competitive set of 8.5 million (still a lot):



Back in 2007, we ranked No. 2 on Google organically for “Facebook ads.”


And while that might sound good, what actually happened is that I got overwhelmed with tons of random requests for consulting–mostly unqualified.


We had no lead magnets or filtering process, so I ended up doing a lot of free consulting to find out which leads were serious. So I learned the hard way that rankings are less important than driving high-quality traffic.


Here is a snapshot from our Google Search Console (used to be called Webmaster Tools), which should be part of your Google Analytics:



While the “dollar a day” tactic is something that I happen to think is important, it's not in the top 50 things that people are searching for where we show up in Google. So the folks who are strong at SEO know that it's smarter to listen to what the market wants than what you or the big boss happens to think is important.


In this case, you can clearly see that people want to know what social media consulting should cost. And if you do a search on Google for this, the type-ahead results confirm all flavors of this:


screenshot-2016-10-19-03-29-38


If you believe in the principle of amplification, which is to take a good thing and make it better, then you'll use this signal to get more of what Google thinks you're good at.


Here we are ranked No. 4 organically for “social media consulting fees”:



I had no idea there were so many people searching for this, and that if I made an effort to write a few more articles, we'd be able to “throw fuel on the fire” here.


So I went ahead and shared this article on Facebook:



And because it's already worked well in search, it will likely work well in social–especially if I boost it for $1 per day against the audiences that Google Analytics already says have enjoyed this content. It's like cheating.

 

I'll bet that if you look at your search console, you'll also find that what the market wants and what you think they want are two different things.


We could even update this article with quotes from other people that are authoritative–not just to send a stronger signal to Google, but to make a better article that deserves to rank for this search.


Use your social media superpowers to get other properties to talk about your content. They don't have to link to you or even use your keywords as hypertext (the blue links)–social mentions do count, and building relationships count.


Simply sharing it on various channels, perhaps with a boost, will increase awareness, more people reading the content, more people linking to your content (if it's worthy), and better search-engine rankings.


Thus, by simply doing your job in social, you're helping your brand's Google search results. And the person whose job is to do SEO should be producing great content for you and other webmasters, which helps your social results.


SEO, public relations, social media marketing, content marketing and word of mouth are increasingly becoming the same discipline. There are different tools and different channels, but in common is the production and sharing of content that is worthy of distribution.


Image on homepage courtesy of Shutterstock.




FilmFish Film Recommendation App Launches on iOS

Film recommendation application FilmFish launched on iOS. The app allows users to browse movie recommendations curated by “film buffs.”


The FilmFish app was created by film critic Joyce Kulhawik, actor Topher Grace, serial entrepreneur Simon Borrero, Sundance Film Festival featured producer Daniel Posada and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professors Donald Sull and David Hartzband.


FilmFish Screenshots


Once users download FilmFish, they can select the streaming services they currently use or subscribe to, which allows the app to recommend movies to them based on their availability on those services. Specifically, the app allows users to select from Netflix, Crackle, HBO Go, Amazon Prime Video and Hulu Plus.


From there, users can search for films manually or browse curated lists in a variety of genres or themes such as action, comedy and romance. When browsing a list, users can tap each movie to learn more about it, and they also can tap the “Free for Me” button to filter the list to only show films that are available on their subscribed services.


A movie's page includes a variety of information about the movie, such as its description and its rating on Rotten Tomatoes. A movie's page also lists the streaming services where it is currently available. Finally, a movie's page includes links to similar movies that users may wish to browse. Users can watch a trailer for each movie without leaving the app.


Elsewhere, users can save movies to their profiles to access their pages again later on, and they can also flag movies as “Seen It” to indicate they've already watched them. In addition, a “Weekly Picks” section allows users to browse film recommendations based on specific themes such as “Golden Oldie,” “Chick-Flick” and so on.


FilmFish is available to download for free on the iTunes App Store. The app is coming soon to Android.




The Step-by-Step Guide to Creating Scannable Content

books


Rarely do people read content from beginning to end.


Maybe it's because of our “microwave,” instant gratification culture. Maybe it's because millions of other articles are vying for people's attention.


Or maybe it's because reading from screens takes about 25% longer than reading from paper. Research has even indicated that readers experience an unpleasant feeling when reading online text.


Whatever the case may be, it's crucial to take the right approach when writing for online readers-a new approach.


There's a certain art to digital writing that differs significantly from writing traditional paper text.


If you expect to convert more of your audience into actual customers, you need to crack the code.


You need to switch up your game plan.


In my early days of writing, I didn't realize this. I had an eye for visual appeal, but I was unsure of how this applied to blogging. There I was, blogging away every day without realizing how people were viewing my articles.


Now, I have a better idea of how people interact with written content online.


What you're viewing right now is a result of my research and testing.


It's about scannable content.


What you're up against


First, let me set the stage for the idea of scannable content.


Did you know that 55% of people spend fewer than 15 seconds actively on a page?


That's not ideal when your goal is to keep visitors exploring and to get them interested in your product/service/brand.


You've got only a small window to grab their attention and motivate them to read your content. And it's not realistic to expect visitors to read it in its entirety. Hardly anyone does that anymore.


In fact, research on the way people read websites found that only 16% of their subjects read a webpage word by word. Most participants-79% of the test subjects-scanned new pages they came across.


The takeaway is that less than two out of 10 people will actually read an entire blog post. The vast majority will be highly selective about what they read and will merely scan through it.


Another interesting thing is that just because content gets shared doesn't mean reading engagement increases.


Chartbeat analyzed 10,000 articles shared on social media and found “that there was no relationship whatsoever between the amount a piece of content is shared and the amount of attention an average reader will give that content.”


This graph illustrates this phenomenon:


image01


What's the solution?


It's simple. You need to become adept at writing scannable content. This is what the modern digital reader is looking for (whether they consciously know it or not).


What exactly is scannable content?


According to Forbes,


“scannable content is short, sweet and to the point. Sentences and paragraphs are brief. Bold text and bullet points highlight key points. Links to other content are used to provide your readers with supplemental information.”


This writing format is geared toward 21st century readers, who primarily read content on a screen as opposed to a book or any other print publication.


It's specifically tailored to streamline the way readers absorb information to keep them interested.


And it works.


Dr. Jakob Nielsen even found that scannable online content boosted readability by 57%. If you're used to conventional writing (e.g., large blocks of text), you need to throw that approach out the window.


You need to embrace scannability. Fortunately, there's a step-by-step process you can follow.


1. Write short paragraphs


You might have noticed that I prefer to use short paragraphs in my content.


Really short. In fact, a lot of my paragraphs are only a single sentence in length.


That's not by accident.


I would say that this technique is perhaps the most important when it comes to creating scannable content.


Allow me to provide you with an example. Here's a large, ugly block of text:


image04


You probably find yourself straining your eyes to read through it.


And here's some text broken down into much smaller, more digestible chunks:


image05


Which do you find more aesthetically pleasing and easier to read?


I would bet you'd say the second one.


It's broken up in a way that allows you to move seamlessly from one point to the next without it taxing your brain in the process.


The key is to include only one idea per paragraph and make it a maximum of four sentences. However, I try to stick with just one to three.


Remember that white space is your friend, so use plenty of it to break up text into smaller chunks.


2. Keep your sentences short


There's no reason to drag your content out by writing long-winded sentences and using PhD-level vocabulary words that only the academic elite will understand.


You need to remember that your audience will consist of a lot of different readers with varying levels of education (and vocabulary).


If readers have to continually check the dictionary just to understand what you're trying to say, it defeats the whole purpose.


That's why you're better off keeping your sentences fairly brief and not getting overly wordy just for the sake of sounding smart.


As a rule of thumb, any more than 16 words per sentence is too long.


Be practical, and try to simplify complex information as much as possible so that everyone can understand it. “Dumb it down” if you have to, but keep the value high.


3. Follow the four-syllable rule


A simple strategy to ensure your writing isn't wordy is to avoid using any words with more than four syllables.


For instance, you would want to stay away from:



  • Unintelligibly

  • Appropriation

  • Lackadaisical


You get the idea.


Your readers should be able to maneuver their way through your content without becoming exhausted during the process.


4. Use subheaders


Most readers won't be interested in every single point of your article.


Instead, most readers would prefer to bounce around to seek out the few pieces of key information that interest them the most.


You can accommodate this desire by including several subheaders throughout the body of your content.


This breaks it down in a logical way that makes your content “flow.”


If you read posts from any of my blogs including Quick Sprout, Crazy Egg, and Neil Patel, you'll notice that I take full advantage of subheaders.


They serve as a quick and easy way to locate main points and accelerate the scanning process. Just make sure that each subheader encapsulates what the following paragraphs cover.


Also, try not to get too clever or cute about it. Instead, keep your subheadings simple and practical.


5. Use bullet points


Who doesn't love bullet points? I know I do.


They seamlessly break down information so readers can extract key data without having to think too much about it.


Here's a good example of bullet points used to perfection:


image02


Rather than writing out your list in a sentence, separating your points by commas, create a bullet list, and your readers will love you for it.


6. Sprinkle in images


Images serve two distinct purposes.


First, they serve as an eye candy and fulfill your reader's subconscious desire for visual stimuli.


image00


Second, they provide periodic breaks between blocks of text.


Both help keep readers on your site for longer and encourage them to engage with your content.


I try to throw in an image at least every few paragraphs or so because I know the images I use enrich my content with information and add validity to my points.


I recommend using data-driven pictures (like graphs) or images to serve as examples, rather than merely using “placeholders,” because these will really add to the overall depth of your content.


7. Add links to external sources


To add authority and credibility to your writing, it's a good idea to include quotes, data points, graphs, etc. from reliable sources.


I do this with pretty much every piece of content I write. It backs up my argument and proves that I'm not just pulling statistics out of thin air.


But since it's not practical to include every gory detail, you'll want to simply include a key sentence or two and insert a link to the original source.


If your readers wish to learn more about a certain topic you cover, they can simply visit the link. As a result, this won't bog down your content with extraneous information.


8. Create lists


I love lists.


There's something about breaking down content in a logical, sequential order I find satisfying. It keeps things neat and tidy.


Apparently, I'm not alone.


A study performed by Buzzsumo and Okdork analyzed over 100 million articles to determine which received the most shares. According to their findings, lists were the second most shareable format (only infographics were shared more).


image03


If you really want to maximize the scannability of your content, use plenty of lists.


I'm not saying do this for every single piece of content you create because it will become redundant, but 50% or so should be a good number to shoot for.


Lists are a great weapon to have in your arsenal because they lend themselves to being scanned naturally.


Conclusion


Creating scannable content has arguably never been more important than it is today.


By accommodating the modern online reader and presenting information in a streamlined, visually appealing way, you can improve the reader's experience.


This technique is also effective for preventing “cognitive overload,” which can drain a reader's mental energy.


The end result is happier readers who spend more time on your site and who are more likely to convert.


Can you think of any additional techniques for making content more scannable?




Facebook Vote Planner Feature Prepares Users for Election Day

After doing its part to get voters to register and endorse their candidates of choice, Facebook introduced a feature to give voters all of the information on what they will be voting on.


The social network's vote planner presents an outline of candidates and ballot initiatives that will appear on users' ballots Nov. 8, Election Day, as well as information on where candidates stand on issues.


FacebookPreviewYourBallot


Facebook teamed up with the nonpartisan Center for Technology and Civic Life on the information presented within its vote planner, and the social network said it provided a way for users to report issues with data from the CTCL.


Controls for who sees choices made by users within Facebook's vote planner were also made available.


Facebook said in a Newsroom post introducing its vote planner feature:


The candidates are presented in random order in a horizontal scroll, and there are several ways to interact with the candidate profiles. You can view their issue positions (information candidates have provided about their policy positions), their endorsements, recent posts and their website. You can also add a candidate to your favorites to create your plan to bring with you on Election Day.


FacebookVotePlannerPresidentialCandidates FacebookVotePlannerCandidateDetails


When you first visit this feature, we will show you information about the candidates running for president and statewide races. If you would like information about your local election, you will be asked to add your address. This is optional.


How you vote is a personal matter, and we've taken steps to make sure that you have utmost control over your plan. After you make a selection, you have to choose who you want to be able to see it (“Only me” or “Friends”). For example, you may want to be private about your choice for president, but share with friends your pick for a congressional race or a ballot initiative.


FacebookVotePlannerPropositions FacebookVotePlannerPropositionsPrivacySettings


Many people look to friends and family for information and guidance about how to vote, so if you're undecided about a race you can ask your friends for advice on Messenger. If you decide to make a choice visible to friends, they can see it inside their own voting plan (it won't create a post in News Feed).


Readers: What are your thoughts on Facebook's vote planner feature?




FacebookFinalPresidentialDebateNotification




Periscope Removes Follower Requirements From VIP Program

Following the reveal of its VIP Program in September, Periscope announced that it changed the requirements users must meet before being eligible for the program.


The Periscope VIP Program gives eligible broadcasters access to a variety of benefits, including badges on their Periscope profiles and “prioritization in people search results.” When the VIP Program was announced, Periscope said it would require users to have at least 10,000 followers on Periscope in order to quality for Bronze, the lowest tier of the program.


Now, Periscope removed the follower requirements from the program, and it has placed the focus on the average number of live viewers users have for each broadcast.


In a blog post, Periscope commented:


Many of you shared with us that “number of followers” is not always the best indication of live content, and we agree. During the past few weeks, we've had multiple conversations on the program requirements and what we can do to better reflect what's most important to our community. We believe that average live viewers per broadcasts meet that requirement. The live interactions and audiences you've brought together on Periscope are at the heart of what we do, and we will be focusing on those metrics to review applications. Follower count has been totally removed from the requirements.


As part of this update, Periscope increased the average number of live viewers users need to have for each broadcast to be eligible for the Silver and Gold tiers of the VIP Program.


Specifically, while users were previously required to have an average of 300 live viewers per broadcast to be eligible for the Silver tier (in addition to the follower requirement), the Silver tier now requires users to have an average of 750 live viewers per broadcast. In addition, while the Gold tier previously required users to have an average of 500 live viewers per broadcast, this number has been increased to 2,000.


The live viewer requirement for the Bronze tier (an average of 200 live viewers per broadcast) hasn't been changed.


In addition, the program still requires users to broadcast, on average, two times per week to be eligible for any of the three tiers.


Periscope continued:


With the focus on live viewership, more than one-third of broadcasters who apply to the program are accepted, and the majority of people who don't qualify are extremely close. This excites us because it revalidates that these new requirements are a better representation of what should qualify a broadcaster for the VIP program. We will review the new and existing applications on a biweekly basis.


Readers: What do you think about this change to the Periscope VIP Program?